D25D FrameworkTTM Data
Performance vs sector and industry peers across 40 metrics.
- Peer Comparison: 2.7 / 5 (Adequate) against 39 sector peers in United States · Small Cap · Basic Materials
- Pillars: strongest Top Line Growth 3.8, weakest Returns Overview 1.0 (7 of 10 ranked)
- Ranks: ROIC 9th percentile

stockoscope.com
Lightwave Logic, Inc.
LWLG|Basic Materials|Chemicals - Specialty
Comparing against 39 sector peers in United States · Small Cap · Basic Materials
Peer Comparison
Dimension 2 of 5
Revenue Growth
100%ile
165.2%
Growth & Cash Flow Quality Percentile ranking across profitability growth and cash generation
Net Income Growth
7.8%
PoorWeakAdequateStrongExceptional
PoorWeakAdequateStrongExceptional
PoorWeakAdequateStrongExceptional
PoorWeakAdequateStrongExceptional
PoorWeakAdequateStrongExceptional
PoorWeakAdequateStrongExceptional
PoorWeakAdequateStrongExceptional
PoorWeakAdequateStrongExceptional
Leverage & Coverage (TTM) Net Debt/EBITDA
45%ile
2.04
Operational Efficiency (TTM) Cash Conv. Cycle
94%ile
-77.0
TTM: Trailing Twelve Months · EBITDA: Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation & Amortization · EBIT: Earnings Before Interest & Taxes · ROA: Return on Assets · ROIC: Return on Invested Capital · ROCE: Return on Capital Employed · ROE: Return on Equity · OCF: Operating Cash Flow · FCF: Free Cash Flow · DSO: Days Sales Outstanding · WC: Working Capital
See the complete picture
The full 5D Framework: Business Quality · Peer Comparison · Valuation · Analyst Sentiment · Smart Money
Explore LWLG on stockoscope.com→
Generated September 21, 2026
For educational purposes only. Not financial advice. Data may be delayed or incomplete.
39 sector peers (United States · Small Cap · Basic Materials)
1Top-Line and Profit Growth
How does the company's growth rate compare to peers?
Is the company growing shareholder value faster than competitors?
Does the company maintain better profit margins than peers?
Is the company more operationally efficient than competitors?
Does the company generate better returns on capital than peers?
How does the company's cash generation compare to peers?
7Liquidity and Working Capital
Does the company maintain better liquidity positions than competitors?
Is the company's debt burden more manageable than peers?
Is the company's stock valuation attractive relative to peers?
10Dividend and Shareholder Yield
Does the company deliver superior income to shareholders compared to peers?
Peer companies
The 39 companies LWLG is compared against across its sector and industry cohorts.
- Apogee Enterprises, Inc.
- Compass Minerals International, Inc.
- Contango Ore, Inc.
- Critical Metals Corp.
- Dakota Gold Corp.
- Ecovyst Inc.
- Elemental Royalty Corporation Common Stock
- FMC Corporation
- Green Plains Inc.
- Huntsman Corporation
- Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation
- i-80 Gold Corp.
- Intrepid Potash, Inc.
- Ivanhoe Electric Inc.
- Janus International Group, Inc.
- Koppers Holdings Inc.
- Kronos Worldwide, Inc.
- Latham Group, Inc.
- Limbach Holdings, Inc.
- LSB Industries, Inc.
- Mativ Holdings, Inc.
- McEwen Mining Inc.
- Metallus Inc.
- NioCorp Developments Ltd.
- NPK International Inc.
- NWPX Infrastructure, Inc.
- Oil-Dri Corporation of America
- Olin Corporation
- Quanex Building Products Corporation
- Rayonier Advanced Materials Inc.
- REalloys Inc.
- REX American Resources Corporation
- Stepan Co
- SunCoke Energy, Inc.
- Sylvamo Corp
- Tecnoglass Inc.
- Tronox Holdings plc
- United States Antimony Corporation
- Worthington Steel, Inc.